Quite Obviously, PM line contrary to CEA

Today, I was reaffirmed my view on GST and growth of india by Chief economic adviser Mr.Aravind Subramanian statement aspects.

My suspects on his aspects:

"Cement and white goods are not demerit goods, but the government was deliberately “going slow” on those items due to revenue considerations"said by CEA. 

• How merited goods added under demerit list for the view of revenue only? 

• Have this govt. making policy for govt revenue or people welfare? Govt. for people or People for govt?  

It is not possible to grow over 8 % without strong contribution from exports. “If you love foreign capital then you have to pay the price for it. There is no free lunch in this business”said by CEA. 

• Our PM calling foreigner for foreign capital investment in India. But CEA voice is inverse to the PM, is wonder. How? Have any other meaning on it?

• How will be more valuable export possible without native farming? Which is backbone for India in school book.

• The Govt of India doesn't give more importance to the farming(Made by Indian). But despite of that, motivating corporate like foreign direct investment and etc., Then how we can achieve real export target?

• Our govt investing unexpected amount for make in India. Is fine over made by Indian?. Make in India is a unsecured income but Made by Indian will secure to country.

• I am paying many tax knowingly and unknowingly. Where is that all going? Have they providing any reasonable welfare like Education, Healthcare, Transport and etc.,

By Kavi